SOURCED COMPARISON
RedPen vs Eklavvya
A corporate and university assessment platform with coding tests, video interviews and voice assessment alongside exams.
Create a workspace
50 students free · 15 days · no card
Reasons to pick them
Where Eklavvya is stronger
Breadth we do not have: coding assessments, video interviews and voice assessment, plus a genuinely free tier of 25 exams. If you are assessing developers or running interviews, that is not us.
Checked on 20 August 2026
Where we are different
| RedPen | Eklavvya | |
|---|---|---|
| Price published on the website | Yes — a published per-student-per-year price, unlimited exams |
Not published on their site
Tier contents are published; no currency amounts appear.
|
| How you are billed | Per student per year, from a prepaid wallet. No subscription. |
Annual subscription, metered in exam credits
“All Plans are Annual Subscriptions, Billed Annually”
|
| Proctoring included at the base price | Yes — all three modes, same price | No — proctoring is an Enterprise-tier feature |
| White-label / own branding | Yes | Yes — Enterprise tier |
| Public API | Yes — read and write, plus webhooks |
Yes — Professional tier
“API integration”
|
| Face checks run in the student’s browser | Yes — analysed in the browser |
Not published on their site
Proctoring is described as image and video capture and analysis; no in-browser-only claim appears.
|
| Public credential verification page | Yes — /verify, no login | Not published on their site |
| Free way to start | Yes — create a workspace yourself, 50 students free for 15 days, no card | Free plan — 25 exams, 1 GB storage |
| Question types published | 9, listed | MCQ, descriptive, coding, video interview, case study, voice |
Checked against each company’s own website on the date shown. Where a cell says “not published”, it means we could not find the claim on their site — not that the feature does not exist.