SOURCED COMPARISON
RedPen vs Conduct Exam
Web-based exam software for institutes and recruiters, with auto, live and ID-authentication proctoring.
Create a workspace
50 students free · 15 days · no card
Reasons to pick them
Where Conduct Exam is stronger
The closest published feature match on question types, including audio and video questions — which we do not offer.
Checked on 20 August 2026
Where we are different
| RedPen | Conduct Exam | |
|---|---|---|
| Price published on the website | Yes — a published per-student-per-year price, unlimited exams |
Not published on their site
No pricing page.
|
| How you are billed | Per student per year, from a prepaid wallet. No subscription. | Not published on their site |
| Proctoring included at the base price | Yes — all three modes, same price |
Not published on their site
Auto, live and ID-authentication proctoring are described; the commercial packaging is not stated.
|
| White-label / own branding | Yes |
Yes
“White Labeling with Client URL”
|
| Public API | Yes — read and write, plus webhooks |
Not published on their site
Only payment-gateway integration is mentioned.
|
| Face checks run in the student’s browser | Yes — analysed in the browser | Not published on their site |
| Public credential verification page | Yes — /verify, no login | Not published on their site |
| Free way to start | Yes — create a workspace yourself, 50 students free for 15 days, no card | Free demo; no trial stated |
| Question types published | 9, listed | Single, multiple, true/false, matrix match, match the following, fill in the blanks, descriptive, audio/video |
Checked against each company’s own website on the date shown. Where a cell says “not published”, it means we could not find the claim on their site — not that the feature does not exist.